#indieweb 2017-03-28

2017-03-28 UTC
snarfed, miklb, nitot and tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
good evening #indieweb
#
tantek
checks logs
#
GWG
Does anyone have fragments on their webmention source URLs?
mlncn, davidmead and snarfed joined the channel
#
snarfed
GWG: bridgy source page
#
snarfed
GWG: bridgy source page
#
snarfed
dammit :P
#
snarfed
bridgy source pages' u-urls for likes and reposts (and maybe rsvps) often have fragments
#
snarfed
u-urls, not source urls...but hopefully we're all using u-url for most things anyway, right? right? :P
#
tantek
apparently IRC too ;)
#
GWG
snarfed: I got target fragments in Webmention the plugin, but there is no issue with source fragments I can see.
#
GWG
They were always supported, but I was wondering if anyone had any.
Leeky, nitot, TC14, [kevinmarks], tolerablyjake and wagle joined the channel
#
KartikPrabhu
GWG: anyone who sends webmentions for marginalia ;)
#
GWG
KartikPrabhu, wouldn't that be a Target Fragment?
#
aaronpk
media fragments saying my song was used in a podcast where the source URL links to the time offset of when the song appears
#
KartikPrabhu
ok then anyone receiving marginalia
#
KartikPrabhu
hmmm no that doesn't work either!
#
KartikPrabhu
source fragments seems weird
#
GWG
That was my point
#
KartikPrabhu
now I am wondering why one would send a webmention from a fragment from a normal h-entry (discounting aaronpk's example)
#
aaronpk
why would you discount my example?
#
aaronpk
it would be basically saying "I mentioned you *here*" with a link not just to the URL, but also to the spot on the page the link appears
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: simply to restrict to text posts. your example is a legitimarte example. also has anyone sent such webmentions?
#
aaronpk
i think martymcguire[m] maybe sent one, but i'm not sure which of his podcasts did
#
aaronpk
but i think it makes sense for text posts too. especially if your blog post is super long, or has a bunch of headers or something.
#
GWG
aaronpk, I am not. Still looking for more clarity
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: also is it useful for the receiver to distinguish between the fragment and the whole post in such cases?
#
KartikPrabhu
for target fragments, marginalia seems to be a use-case
#
aaronpk
only in that if you show the comment, the link back could take you right to the right spot
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: fair enough
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: that is actually a good point. source with fragments will link to the actual place but will retain the context in the whole post!
#
martymcguire[m]
aaronpk: I haven't sent those mentions-with-fragments yet, just regular mentions. I could figure out a workflow for doing that with telegraph I think.
#
aaronpk
i suppose the next question is whether i should treat a URL with a fragment ID as a distinct mention or not
#
GWG
Do we have any examples of this, save media fragments in the wild?
#
martymcguire[m]
Basically: go to time offset, pause to let the JS update the URL, load the URL in telegraph, send just for the audio post in question, repeat for all fragments
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: I think I do already by default. my webmention receiver matches the complete source URL
#
aaronpk
i think mine does too. is that the desired behavior?
#
aaronpk
problem is I would render them the same, so they would look like duplicates
#
KartikPrabhu
aaronpk: I would think yes
#
KartikPrabhu
if they are not replies then I would render them the same too
#
KartikPrabhu
my replies link to the actual full URL
wolftune joined the channel
#
GWG
I think the WordPress receiver would treat them as separate items also
#
GWG
But not display them
#
GWG
as different things
_6a68, wolftune, nitot, snarfed, [jeremycherfas], eduardm, barpthewire, cweiske, miklb_ and squeakytoy joined the channel
#
Loqi
[indieweb] " Growing list of educators & researchers who are using #indieweb. Who am I missing? #HigherEd #edtech #phdchat #DoOO https://twitter.com/ChrisAldrich/lists/educators-in-indieweb/members " by Chris Aldrich on 2017-03-27 http://stream.boffosocko.com/2017/growing-list-of-educators-researchers-who-are-using-indieweb-who
nitot, jihaisse, friedcell, snarfed, Pierre-O, barpthewire, KevinMarks and nitot_ joined the channel
#
@sl007
Wenn "Sagen, was ist" nur noch hinter hohen Facebook Mauern geht ... http://redecentralize.org #spon https://indieweb.org/2017/Düsseldorf @DerSPIEGEL
(twitter.com/_/status/846650827557212160)
adactio, nitot, loicm, [jeremycherfas], rdesfo[m] and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
dgold
omfsm...
#
dgold
Pythonista has the python Requests Library...
#
dgold
oops, sorry, wrong channel
#
[jeremycherfas]
Morning dgold
#
dgold
hey jeremy
barpthewire, mlncn and jihaisse joined the channel
#
Loqi
[indieweb] "Day 8: A specification for rel=canonical, by request #100DaysOfIndieWeb" by Kevin Marks on 2017-03-28 http://known.kevinmarks.com/2017/day-8-a-specification-for-relcanonical-by-request-100daysofindieweb
mindB, martymcguire[m], JulianFoad[m], plindner, M-hotzeplotz, SpEcHiDe, jcgregorio[m], afrogeek[m], pniedzielski[m], TheGillies, Guest86807[m], dgold[m], crasch[m], M-mxuribe, garlox[m], jaduncan[m], R2ZER0, friedcell and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
This ampit bookmarklet is really handy, especially on mobile.
leg joined the channel
[keithjgrant] joined the channel
#
[keithjgrant]
Does anybody use any interesting strategies for displaying reposts? 9 times out of 10, it’s usually a twitter retweet (via brid.gy) or someone sharing it with a comment that is simply the title of the post -- so in these cases it makes sense to just show the author name & the url. But that 1/10 times they add a comment which I'd like to display
#
[keithjgrant]
But I haven't been able to come up with a good strategy for distinguishing meaningful comments from the others
#
[keithjgrant]
(i'm getting my data from wm.io, fwiw)
barpthewire joined the channel
#
dgold
[keithjgrant]: I've never heard of wm.io -- is that a twitter service?
#
sknebel
[keithjgrant]: I'd suggest collecting examples, and then trying to come up with a comparison algorithm... something like "if it contains words that are not the original title and are not "repost", then display" or something like that
#
sknebel
also, I'm not sure if the repost-with-comment is considered purely a repost or not, e.g. the twitter example on /repost and /reposts all show the "plain" form
#
sknebel
dgold: wm.io probably means webmention.io, a webmention receiver service by aaron
#
[keithjgrant]
yeah, webmention.io
#
[keithjgrant]
quoted tweets sure raise some interesting questions. is it a comment? is it a repost? It seems context-sensitive
mlncn and snarfed joined the channel
#
sknebel
I knew I had seen discussion about that ;)
singpolyma joined the channel
#
sknebel
in the case of backfeed from twitter there is of course the issue that retweet is the only tool twitter provides for various use cases
#
sknebel
and you see retweets used to provide reply context, as public bookmarks/recommendations ("go read this!"), ...
friedcell, [kevinmarks], eduardm, arush, KartikPrabhu, jmelesky, tantek, [chrisaldrich] and tolerablyjake joined the channel
#
miklb_
right, with the WP bridgy publish plugin, a quote tweet can't really be a quote tweet & a reply, so it currently is a quote
#
GWG
miklb: How may the Bridgy Public plugin serve you?
#
miklb
great except I can't use the retrieve button due to the JS error
#
GWG
The whole point of the plugin is to turn artisinally crafted microformats into mass produced tweets.
#
GWG
miklb: I have to figure that one out. I have a working theory, but I need to learn more JS.
#
GWG
The extent of my JS is a fill in the blanks sort of thing.
#
miklb
the reason I suggested the https issue is that I don't get that on my dev install locally
wolftune joined the channel
#
GWG
Basically, all the JS code does is request an object from the PHP code and set form fields based on it.
#
GWG
My likely solution is to delve into that a bit. Also, I do have redesign on that area I want to do, to allow an autofill when triggered by Micropub and such
#
miklb
if i get time, I'll try to see if I can do some deeper debugging on my live site. Juggling a few things at the moment.
#
tantek
listens in on the quote vs reply conversation
snarfed, snarfed1, miklb, nitot, [kevinmarks], [cleverdevil], adactio, aquarius__, gRegorLove, sonicrocketman, raretrack and mlncn joined the channel
#
gRegorLove
Good morning, indieweb
#
Loqi
gRegorLove: tantek left you a message 1 day ago: HWC Bellingham next week? (first Wednesday of the month)
tolerablyjake, BigShip and snarfed joined the channel
#
tantek
catches up on last night's logs
#
tantek
not sure about the use-cases for sending a webmention with a source URL with a fragment
#
tantek
also not sure how it would make the most sense to display them etc.
#
tantek
smells like a solution looking for a problem, or plumbing looking for a use-case
#
aaronpk
really? I thought the example of time offset for a podcast was pretty useful
#
tantek
oops I meant source URL with a fragment into *text*
#
tantek
mediafragments make sense yes for that use-case
#
tantek
I think aaronpk's concern about "would look like duplicates" is a good example
#
tantek
er, good real problem that could drive design
#
tantek
another UI challenge
#
tantek
right now when a post shows "Mentions" (beyond specific comments, likes etc.)
wolftune joined the channel
#
tantek
if a user clicks on one of those mentions links to go to the original, if it's a small note it works fine (the mention in context is likely obvious), but if the original response is long text, perhaps an article with sections and subheadings, and LOTS of mentions, then the context of the mention is lost / difficult to find
#
@egoexpress
Switched my @withknown site https://known.stierand.org to use the current dev version from Github. Now for some plugin debugging. #indieweb
(twitter.com/_/status/846789187487465472)
#
tantek
now what if that long article mentions a post multiple times? e.g. in multiple sections?
#
tantek
if the "mentions" section of that post were to only link to the whole article, or to just one of the specific fragments, then the fact that the article mentioned a post multiple times would be lost
#
tantek
so to back that up a step into a how question:
#
tantek
if an article mentions another post multiple times, what would the author of that original post want to display?
#
tantek
(or a what question rather)
#
tantek
one thought: if an article linked to one of my posts in multiple contexts, it would be nice to be able to indicate that on *my* post, e.g. in such a Mentions section:
#
tantek
* Article Name (^1, ^2, ^3)
#
tantek
where Article Name would link to the whole article, and the ^n links would link to fragments of the paragraph or section of the specific mentions of my post
#
tantek
Ideally that's what I'd like to show on my original post from a presentation perspective
#
tantek
and I think such a design could also address aaronpk's concern of "would look like duplicates" - as I too would only want "Article Name" to be listed *once* in my mentions
#
tantek
(no matter how many times it links to my post)
#
tantek
(hence the ^1... ^n parenthetical links to potentially list the specific mentions in context for easier navigation / discoverability)
#
tantek
like you might see in a traditional print book Index at the end, Some Topic, p. 17, 23, 58
#
tantek
the Index is both saying "Some Topic" is mentioned in the book, and the specific page numbers where it was mentioned (so you can go look at just those specific pages instead of having to search the whole book for the mention)
#
tantek
mentions*
snarfed joined the channel
#
Loqi
[indieweb] "Indieweb Quote of the Day: Vladimir Bukovsky On Samizdat" by Chris Aldrich on 2017-03-28 http://boffosocko.com/2017/03/28/indieweb-quote-of-the-day-vladimir-bukovsky-on-samizdat/
#
@ChrisAldrich
#Indieweb Quote of the Day: V. Bukovsky narrowly defines Samizdat, Russian word that translates as self-published http://boffosocko.com/2017/03/28/indieweb-quote-of-the-day-vladimir-bukovsky-on-samizdat/
(twitter.com/_/status/846793372786319361)
#
tantek
!tell KartikPrabhu one possible use-case for SOURCE URLs with fragments, curious what you think: https://chat.indieweb.org/2017-03-28#t1490725161795000
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
Loqi
[tantek] right now when a post shows "Mentions" (beyond specific comments, likes etc.)
wolftune, [kevinmarks], KartikPrabhu, nitot, snarfed, leg and [dgold] joined the channel
#
[dgold]
If posting a reply-to to a website via webmention, and additionally POSSEing that response to silos, how should one contextualise the POSSEd elements?
#
[dgold]
Or, indeed, should one POSSE the reply at all?
[cleverdevil] joined the channel
#
tantek
dgold, glad you asked. lots of prior work on this. short answer yes, one should, and thread in that silo accordingly. longer answer, e.g. for @-replies: https://indieweb.org/Twitter#POSSE_Replies_to_Twitter
#
[dgold]
Thanks tantek, I was thinking also about a reply to (from personal experience today) a persons Known instance. I POSSEd that response to silos (twitter and pnut)
#
[dgold]
My reply post is here, it links to the two silos:
#
Loqi
[Daniel Goldsmith] Best of luck with that Bjorn; if you get some headway with the reactions plugin, I can think of a number of people who'd be interested
#
[dgold]
The twitter post gives context (because the Idno people are awesome) extracted from the known post I was replying to.
#
[dgold]
The pnut post, on the contrary (does not)
#
aaronpk
by "context" you mean the full contents of your post?
#
aaronpk
on twitter, the twitter card?
#
tantek
on twitter I'd presume the tweet thread as context
#
tantek
as the original reply context we modeled :)
#
aaronpk
ah, the reply context
#
aaronpk
I wouldn't have POSSE'd that to pnut
#
[dgold]
Yeah, I can see that now
#
[dgold]
To be honest, I just wanted to see that my plugin was posseing replies to pnut at all
#
[dgold]
Which got me started on thinking about this.
#
tantek
what is pnut?
#
Loqi
pnut is a short-messaging social network silo in which messages have a limited length, and you can follow folks, and be followed by folks https://indieweb.org/pnut
KartikPrabhu and snarfed joined the channel
#
gRegorLove
Hah, I thought at first pnut was someone's handle
#
gRegorLove
Interesting they're using Patreon to fund development.
#
gRegorLove
What is Patreon?
#
Loqi
Patreon is a crowd-based, recurring funding site to support and pay content creators https://indieweb.org/Patreon
wolftune joined the channel
#
gRegorLove
[dgold]: Have you (or anyone) suggested they add mf2 to pnut?
#
tantek
that is interesting, since it's an ongoing payment model instead of just one-time like kickstarter
#
gRegorLove
Also "When you invite someone, they are associated with you in the user tree and you may be responsible for them if they abuse the network."
#
tantek
yes that's clever
#
aaronpk
heh, it's like the opposite of the viral growth pattern of web 2.0
#
tantek
gmail was invite only beta for a while
#
tantek
I think they used that in security recovery!
#
bear
but am I also now beholden to anyone below the people i've invited? how many layers down the tree am I responsible for?
#
@ChrisAldrich
@physcocode Given @drupal codebase/structure, perhaps you could backport to @withknown? It would be great to see more #indieweb in @drupal!
(twitter.com/_/status/846838125401903104)
#
Loqi
[indieweb] "@physcocode Given @drupal codebase/structure, perhaps you could backport to @withknown? It would be great to see more #indieweb in @drupal!" by Chris Aldrich on 2017-03-28 http://stream.boffosocko.com/2017/physcocode-given-drupal-codebasestructure-perhaps-you-could-backport-to-withknown
ben_thatmustbeme joined the channel
#
tantek
bear I'd assume 1
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
#
[dgold]
Per the founder of the network, your accountable for your invites.
#
[dgold]
s/your/you're
#
[dgold]
Fscking autocorrect
#
[dgold]
has been using gmail since day1; friend is (now) an emea veep @ google
leg joined the channel
#
tantek
chrisaldrich wow I've never seen the "9+ to confirm" UI in Swarm - maybe that's Android only?
#
aaronpk
i've seen it on iOS too
#
aaronpk
check your settings for "show check-in suggestions in history"
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
You always check in everywhere tantek, no wonder you haven't seen it
#
[kevinmarks]
The reason gmail was invite only ta first was that they sharded by user and had a limited number of servers so needed to throttle growth
#
tantek
aaronpk, where in settings? it's not in iOS Settings / Swarm
#
tantek
oh just found the subtle gear icon right in the middle of the profile screen duh
#
tantek
Show Check-in Suggestions in History is ON
#
aaronpk
well you do check in a lot, so it may not have any further suggestions
#
tantek
hmm, I'm going to turn off the coin sounds, I think that's too distracting to everyone else
#
aaronpk
yes! thank goodness
#
tantek
it should do check-ins by distance, not time
#
tantek
er, not frequency
#
tantek
*suggested checkins
#
aaronpk
it's also possible the iPod GPS doesn't get enough location data in the background to make any suggestions
snarfed joined the channel
#
aaronpk
er, iPod location services. there is no GPS.
#
tantek
too bad it can't bluetooth it from my watch which is more accurate than iPhone GPS :P
#
aaronpk
that's actually not that far fetched. there are external GPS devices you can buy that connect via bluetooth to iOS and then all the iOS location services use that data instead
#
tantek
wait what - how do you configure iOS to use an external GPS device?
#
aaronpk
if the device advertises that it supplies GPS data, then when you pair it it just goes
#
aaronpk
and it's at the system level, so all apps will start using that
#
aaronpk
a common use for this is for pilots to use a better GPS receiver and then pull up maps on an ipad in the plane
#
tantek
that makes total sense
#
aaronpk
"The majority of iPad devices sold by Apple are the Wi-Fi only models, which do not have an internal GPS receiver. Our products provide rock-solid GPS to these iPads and allow you to see your own-ship position in any EFB app."
#
[kevinmarks]
Wouldn't it be great if passenger planes just broadcast that to the devices on board
#
tantek
interesting, I just paired my iPod to my watch from iPod Bluetooth settings
#
tantek
now how do I tell it to use the GPS from my watch?
#
aaronpk
if the watch supports it, it will be doing it already
#
tantek
goes for a walk
wolftune, seekr and tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
I can't tell if it made any difference. I may need a realtime location info graphing app to see
#
tantek
also I think my watch turns off bluetooth and GPS automatically to save battery, so I have to figure out how to put it in a "report location continuously" mode
#
tantek
it's a Suunto in case anyone has any ideas
leg joined the channel