GitHub

From IndieWeb
(Redirected from Github)

This article is a stub. You can help the IndieWeb wiki by expanding it.


GitHub is a specialized content hosting silo for code, issues, comments, and static content that has some aspects of a commons, and through free domain mapping, a content hosting service as well.

See:

Features

POSSE to GitHub

For POSSEing source code to github, see git.

While git is inherently distributed, all the extra functionality (issues, pull requests, etc.) that GitHub adds on top is not. GitHub has a nice API for interacting with repositories, which makes it pretty easy to POSSE issues, comments on issues, stars, and maybe more.

POSSE an issue

An issue post that is in reply to a particular GitHub repo can (and should) be POSSEd to GitHub as a new issue on that GitHub repo.

See examples of POSSEing issues to GitHub:

POSSE reply to repo

A reply to a GitHub repo path, may make sense to be POSSEd as a comment on that path, e.g. if it is a gist. If the reply is an issue, see above POSSE an issue.

POSSE reply to issue

A reply to a specific GitHub issue can (and should) be POSSEd as a new comment on that issue.

If the GitHub issue was itself originally posted as an indie issue, then be sure to post your reply as a multi-reply in-reply-to both that the indie issue permalink, and its GitHub copy.

POSSE reply to comment

A reply to a comment on a specific GitHub issue can (and should) be POSSEd as a comment in reply to that previous comment.

If that previous comment was itself originally posted as an indie reply, then be sure to post your reply as a multi-reply in-reply-to both that previous indie reply permalink, and its GitHub copy. E.g.:

POSSE star of repo

A star on a GitHub repo can (and should) be POSSEd as a like of the repo.

POSSE reacji to issue or comment

A reacji to a GitHub issue or comment can (and should) be POSSEd as a reaction to that issue/comment on GitHub respectively.

If that GitHub issue or comment was itself originally posted on the indieweb, the be sure to post your reacji as a multi-reply in-reply-to both to the indie issue/reply post permalink and their GitHub copy.

Backfeed

If you POSSE to GitHub in any of the above ways, you should backfeed any replies on your post's GitHub POSSE copy back to your own post so that you can:

  • keep a copy of people's comments on your post
  • view follow-ups to your post on your post, instead of having to visit GitHub's site
  • reply to follow-ups to your post, from your site, instead of using GitHub's UI

Bridgy backfeed supports:

  • comments on issues and PRs
  • emoji reactions to issues and PRs

Additional backfeed to consider implementing

  • tag-of: username1 added the abc label n hours[or days] ago
  • untag-of: username1 removed the abc label n hours[or days] ago
  • ????: closed this in linkedPullRequest n hours[or days] ago

IndieWeb Examples

Aaron Parecki

Aaron Parecki is automatically POSSEing comments on GitHub issues from his own site to GitHub using silo.pub (as of YYYY-MM-DD), and before that was manually POSSEing. E.g.:

At some point Aaron switched to using silo.pub to POSSE to GitHub

  • ... need aaronparecki.com permalink of an issue/comment post in reply to github (preferably first such link after implementing silo.pub auto-POSSE to GitHub)
    • ... need POSSE copy github.com permalink (that was published with silo.pub)

Colin Tedford

Colin Tedford manually POSSEs Github issues, and manually POSSEs and backfeeds comments on GitHub issues (it's just occasional bug reports, so not as onerous as it might be if he were a developer).

Chris Aldrich

Chris Aldrich is occasionally automatically POSSEing comments on GitHub issues from his Known site to GitHub. E.g.:

He does this with the Known plugin to POSSE to GitHub.

Tantek

Tantek Çelik is POSSEing to GitHub using Bridgy Publish since 2018-02-19:

Bridgy

Bridgy can POSSE issues, comments, stars, and emoji reactions to GitHub, as well as backfeed comments and reactions.

If you get an error POSSEing to a particular GitHub repo using Bridgy, you may need to ask the repo's organization's owner(s) to approve Bridgy as an OAuth app for that repo.

See and refer them to: https://help.github.com/articles/approving-oauth-apps-for-your-organization/

Known

Known has a plugin for automatic POSSEing to GitHub:

Silopub

  • silo.pub supports creating issues, commenting on issues and pull requests, and starring repositories since 2016-04-22

PESOS from GitHub

GitHub provides atom feeds of activity on public content the following urls:

  • https://github.com/{{username}}.atom
  • https://github.com/{{username}}/{{repository}}/releases.atom
  • https://github.com/{{username}}/{{repository}}/tags.atom

Example github activity Atom feed from which you can export, PESOS or subscribe to using a feed reader:

For private content, GitHub provides Atom feeds protected by a token. A users' account private feed is autodiscoverable at /dashboard: <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="ATOM" href="/username.private.atom?token=A54RF3F4XPIJ4TGDV2346FQWERLNUYA"/>

If you want a feed of activity by others on your repositories, it looks like you can get it through your "Personal News Feed". "Your personal News Feed shows activity—other than your own!—on repositories you watch. […] To subscribe to your personal News Feed in your favorite RSS reader, click Subscribe to News Feed under your list of repositories." https://help.github.com/articles/news-feed/

Using Github for comments

Some people use Github to gather comments for their blog posts. For each post, an issue is opened. Comments are fetched via the Github API and displayed below the blog post

Examples:

OAuth UI

If you deploy an application that uses GitHub's API and needs to request the user's permission, it will display an OAuth permissions page that looks like *you* (the author of the application) are asking permission.

E.g. Bridgy's GitHub permission initially had a "Authorize snarfed" green button (fixed shortly thereafter, says "Authorize bridgy" since 2018-02-20)

(Old example from 2018-02-09.)

The solution is to deploy the application from a GitHub organization account for your application, either with the same name as your application, or whatever organization your application is a part of, that you're asking your users to "trust".

Bridgy for GitHub now does this ("Authorize bridgy" green button), using the https://github.org/bridgy organization. Example prompt below with updated green button. The real prompt has the real logo and omits "local" / "localhost:8080":

Authorize bridgy screenshot

Feature Details

Account Recovery

As part of GitHub's Account Recovery feature, starting ~ 2018-07-18, GitHub started putting in a forced interstitial to confirm you account recovery settings, e.g. a page with something like this as its entire content:

Any attempt to load a GitHub URL (assuming you were previously logged in) would result in a temporary redirect to that interstitial. You could still view public GitHub URLs in a browser's "Private Mode" without seeing the interstitial (because you were not logged in).

Note: DO NOT only use "Fallback SMS number" as an account recovery mechanism, for all the reasons documented on the SMS page (tl;dr, SMS is horribly insecure, and fairly trivial for a professional to attack - has already happened to numerous people.)

Self-hosted alternatives

Main article: git#Software

There are some self-hosted alternatives to GitHub. Gitlab and Gogs support issue tracking and project management as well.

  • GitLab: full-featured GitHub replacement
  • Gogs: full-featured GitHub replacement
  • Gitolite: web interface for managing repositories, with fine-grained access controls
  • Gitweb: simple web interface for browsing git repositories
  • Formerly Gitorious (acquired by GitLab in March 2015)
  • Formerly Gitosis (deprecated long ago in favor of gitolite)
  • Gitea: Golang, lightweight alternative with many common features

Brainstorming

Brainstorming about further ways to use GitHub from your IndieWeb site.

POSSE note to GitHub

Plain text notes can be POSSEd to GitHub as a gist.

No known examples of anyone doing this yet.

Be the first and add your permalinks here!

Notable Changes

2019 unlimited free private repos

Issues

Account reuse is potential security issue

2018-02-07 GitHub allows account deletion, recreation by another party, with library dependency:

Criticism

DMCA harassment

You can lose your data due to unjustified DMCA takedowns:

DDoS collateral damage

Github is sometimes the target of DDoS attacks, apparently targeted at specific projects. While GitHub seems to be handling the attacks in such a way as to keep access working, this is a vulnerability of any centralized service, that it attracts attacks unrelated to your use of it, that jeopardize your use of it (collateral damage). Most recent first

  • 2015-03-26 DDoS attack [1] via unsuspecting browsers executing scripts from (MitM) faked Baidu requests[2].

March 2017 Terms of Service Update

In March 2017, GitHub updated their terms of service. Several people are upset about the change, which may affect GPL and similarly licensed software.

Contract with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Renewed a $200,000 USD contract with ICE in 2019

2019-11-13 Janus Rose: As GitHub’s Conference Begins, Five Employees Resign Over ICE Contract (archived)

  • The CEO defended the decision, despite the amount not being “financially material for the company.”

    “While ICE does manage immigration law enforcement, including the policies that both GitHub and Microsoft are on record strongly opposing, they are also on the front lines of fighting human trafficking, child exploitation, terrorism and transnational crime,” he wrote, adding that the company would donate $500,000 to non-profits working to combat the effects of Trump’s immigration policies. As of now, the money has not yet been donated.

  • Friedman’s response has outraged many employees. Nearly 25 percent of the company has signed onto an open letter demanding Friedman cancel the contract, including half of the engineering department.

2019-11-13 Megan Rose Dickey: GitHub faces more resignations in light of ICE contract (archived)

  • “We are not satisfied with GitHub’s now-public stance on this issue,” GitHub employees wrote in an open letter. “GitHub has held a ‘seat at the table’ for over 2 years, as these illegal and dehumanizing policies have escalated, with little to show for it. Continuing to hold this contract does not improve our bargaining power with ICE. All it does is make us complicit in their widespread human rights abuses.”

Downtime

Occassionally GitHub fails to handle requests:

2016-07-26 Server Unavailable

No server is currently available to service your request.

Sorry about that. Please try refreshing and contact us if the problem persists.


2018-10-21 Degraded Service

2018-10-21 GitHub experienced over 24 hours of what they called "Degraded Service".

During that time GitHub was effectively "down" for many users and use-cases.

  • Pages (issues/pull requests) not loading
  • Pages (issues/pull requests) out of date
  • Editing issues not working


2022-02 degraded performance

2022-03 service disruptions

GitHub had various outages during the month of March, 2022.

See Also

  • github-pages
  • code
  • issue tracker
  • issue
  • commons
  • Getting Started
  • silo
  • GitHub Actions
  • Introducing GitHub Actions
  • Feature: profile rel-me support to 4 links: https://hachyderm.io/@derekprior/109790473003989772
    • "You can now add up to four social account links to your GitHub profile which render with a sprinkling of formatting support for our most popular platforms. Yes, the resulting links links will satisfy Mastodon verification requirements when rendered.To get started, visit your profile and click the "Edit profile" button in the sidebar." @derekprior February 1, 2023
  • Criticism: unnecessary amounts of ceremony for common prose editing use-cases: https://chat.indieweb.org/meta/2024-06-26#t1719442233333000 (and following)
    • "it's quite satisfying to find a very fixable "hole" like that in Wikipedia and be able to immediately edit save to fix it. No Git(hub) "create a fork" BS, no "Create a patch / pull request" ceremony, no prompted TWO text fields to provide BOTH a summary and a description of the edit, no stupid buttons that say "Merge" or "Squash & Merge" (why?!? so much plumbing BS that the authoring use-case doesn't care about), no "Delete fork" ceremonial" @[tantek] June 26, 2024
Retrieved from "https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?title=GitHub&oldid=95971"